Q&A Ask the Labs By Joseph L. Bruneni Q.
A Progressive Conundrum-design problem or fitting problem -Andy Winters ABOM, COA A.
When we measure a corridor at the lab, we measure the length from the last of plano power (all samples are ground to plano distance) to the beginning of the add power as printed on the lens. Even with this approach, it is only the beginning and not the full width of the add. To reach the point of the widest section of the reading area, the add power is frequently above the power indicated on the lens. Basically, we had to take a position that was repeatable, and I feel this is best because it's simple to undestand. In a separate issue, we find in our Mystery Shopper program that 71 percent of the PALs are [fit] in error. I blame this on poor training (parallax when the optician only uses their dominant eye to fit both of the patient's eyes) and short cuts. -John Young, Colts Laboratories
A.
Certainly with higher seg heights comes wider reading zones, but many patients are perfectly happy losing some of their width in order to wear the frame style they like. In my opinion, the new minimum seg height per the manufacturer is a good guide to the dispenser because it does still preserve enough reading area to be functional. If the fitting height as measured on the patient is more than 1 or 2 mm shorter than that minimum, I believe the dispenser should call the prescribing doctor and ask if the add power could be increased by .25 or .50 to compensate-or else guide the patient to select a different frame. -Neil B. Gailmard, O.D., MBA, FAAO, Gailmard Eye & Laser Center, Munster, Ind. Q.
Allergies and nose pads
A.
-Bob Woyton, product manager, Hilco.EB Got a question you'd like answered in "Ask the Labs?" Send it now!
|
Article
Ask the Labs
Eyecare Business
September 1, 2000